\n
\n
Darren Orf<\/p>\n
April 24, 2026<\/time><\/p><\/div>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<\/header>\n\n \n Western monarch butterflies bask in the sun on a eucalyptus branch at Lighthouse Field State Beach. In December 2025, researchers placed ultralight radio tags on some monarchs at this site, hoping to track their movements and identify areas to prioritize for the species\u2019 conservation.Darren Orf<\/span>On a misty Friday morning in November, with dawn\u2019s last warm hues clinging to the gloomy clouds above, the Pacific Grove Monarch Sanctuary is whisper quiet. Even the persistent roar of the ocean, only a few minutes\u2019 walk from this small copse among single-family homes, is deadened by walls of eucalyptus and Monterey cypress. The tires of approaching cars crunch on a gravel road that slips between two buildings, each adorned with murals of the brilliant monarch butterfly.<\/p>\n
In one of those cars is Natalie Johnston, the interpretive programs manager at the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History. With a pair of binoculars and a clipboard in hand, Johnston, along with a small cadre of volunteers, is canvassing this two-acre sanctuary in search of monarchs.<\/p>\n
Every year, the monarch butterfly makes one of the animal kingdom\u2019s most wondrous migrations as millions flutter across the United States to warmer climates. In the east, their destination is the cozy comfort of central Mexico\u2019s oyamel fir forests, but the much smaller western monarch population\u2014mostly separated from its eastern counterparts by the Rocky Mountains\u2014instead makes its way to Pacific Grove and hundreds of similar sites along the California coast.<\/p>\n
Because monarchs require the sun\u2019s warmth to fly, cool mornings like this one provide the perfect opportunity to count them before they begin stirring. Peering into the canopy, the volunteers categorize the insects by their behavior, counting \u201csunners,\u201d \u201cgrounders,\u201d \u201cloners\u201d and even a \u201cflier\u201d or two. On her clipboard, Johnston notes the individual trees containing butterflies. Today, a few \u201cloners\u201d are scattered throughout the grove, and only one small collection of 72 is nestled together. The day\u2019s final count: 99.<\/p>\n\n \n Liese Murphree (left), director of education and outreach at the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, and Kat Morgan (right), monarch docent, conduct their weekly counts of the monarch butterfly at the Monarch Grove Sanctuary.<\/p>\n
Darren Orf<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIn the past few years, Johnston has experienced some emotional highs during these weekly counts, as in 2021, when a single tree hosted thousands of monarchs among its broad branches. But nothing prepared her for what she witnessed one Friday morning in early 2024.<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2018Oh my God, there are so many grounders,\u2019\u201d Johnston remembers saying after spotting some 200 dead or dying monarchs on private property near the grove. \u201cWe started counting\u2014one, two, three, four, five\u2014but they\u2019re in these dense piles \u2026 spasming, their abdomens curled. \u2026 For so many of them to be wiped out in a single event in a place that was supposed to be safe was just horrible.\u201d<\/p>\n
Johnston describes that day as one of the worst experiences of her life. Over the next two weeks, staff and volunteers continued to see dying monarchs with the same symptoms, though in smaller numbers. A toxicology report published a year later revealed a cocktail of pesticides in the dead insects\u2019 bodies, including some toxins typically found in residential sprays. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n \n Volunteers found dead and dying monarchs in January 2024. A toxicology report revealed several pesticides in the insects\u2019 bodies.<\/p>\n
Kat Morgan<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThis mass casualty is just one highly visible event among many invertebrate dramas that play out every day. Monarchs, as well as hundreds of other butterfly species across the U.S., are struggling to survive against toxic pesticides, habitat loss and a rapidly changing planet. Eastern monarchs face a 56 to 74 percent chance of extinction by 2080, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. And western monarchs, during that same period, have a 99 percent chance of vanishing.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
Quick fact: A spot of hope<\/p>\n
While western monarch counts recently revealed low numbers, the eastern monarch population had some good news in 2026. The amount of habitat occupied by overwintering eastern monarchs increased by 64 percent compared with last year.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Since time immemorial, butterflies like the monarch have been an irreplaceable part of our wild world, but without our help, most of them may soon disappear. That\u2019s why hundreds of scientists, conservationists and volunteers are working together to count and protect this species before it\u2019s too late\u2014because what\u2019s good for the monarch is good for other butterflies as well.<\/p>\n
The plight of the butterflies<\/h2>\n The monarch is only one of the U.S.\u2019s 750 or so butterfly species, each with its own incredible patterns and idiosyncrasies. The tailed orange, for example, flits about the dry southwest. The West Virginia white calls the moist deciduous forests of the Appalachians home. The natural range of the ruddy copper, with its shocking orange flair, stretches the width and breadth of the western mountain ranges. Although these three species differ in appearance, numbers and geography, they\u2019re all in decline.<\/p>\n\n \n The ruddy copper butterfly (Lycaena rubidus<\/em>)<\/p>\n Alan Schmierer via Flickr under public domain<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n \n The West Virginia white butterfly (Pieris virginiensis<\/em>)<\/p>\n Rlephoto (Randy L. Emmitt) via Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nFor the first time, scientists illustrated the full extent of this ecological crisis in a study published in the journal Science<\/em> in March 2025 and in a subsequent State of the Butterflies report from the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. The report covered 554 species and estimated trends for 342 of them, as insufficient data was available for the others. From 2000 to 2020, researchers found, butterflies declined overall by 22 percent across the country. Although some butterflies saw modest increases during that time, a majority did not\u2014and 24 species declined by 90 percent or more, including the tailed orange, the West Virginia white and the ruddy copper.<\/p>\n\u201cWhen a bulldozer comes through, or a giant flood from climate change happens, or a drought happens, or even an invasive species moves in\u2014that\u2019s something you can see,\u201d says Scott Black, executive director of the Xerces Society and co-author of the Science<\/em> study. But pesticides, as demonstrated by the Pacific Grove casualties, are essentially invisible, he adds. \u201cThey\u2019re an unseen, massive threat.\u201d<\/p>\nPesticides in some form or another have been around nearly as long as recorded history: Ancient Sumerians in Mesopotamia used sulfur dusting to control pests and mites around 2500 B.C.E. But after World War II, chemical companies in the U.S. created powerful insecticides like Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, or DDT, to control growing pest populations spurred by the vulnerabilities inherent in raising only one crop, or monoculture farming.<\/p>\n
Public backlash against DDT in the 1960s led to new pesticide formulas designed to cause less harm to other living things, including humans, while being orders of magnitude deadlier to insects\u2014sort of like trading in an indiscriminate chemical shotgun for a hyper-focused sniper rifle. Across the pesticide industry, the prevailing mind-set, according to some conservationists, became \u201cspray first and ask questions later\u201d\u2014or maybe don\u2019t ask questions at all.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe insecticides we\u2019re spraying are more toxic. We\u2019re spraying different kinds that are combining, and we\u2019re spraying more of these chemicals across these landscapes,\u201d Black says. This is why \u201cbutterflies and other insects are declining at greater rates in the 2000s than in the past.\u201d<\/p>\n
In a study published in September in the journal Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry<\/em>, the University of Nevada Reno ecologist Matt Forister and his team analyzed 336 individual plants, including milkweeds vital to the monarch\u2019s survival, at urban sites in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Sacramento, California. They found that only 22 of those plants had no detectable levels of pesticides. On average, the plants contained at least three types of chemicals, and 71 of them contained concentrations of pesticides that are lethal or nearly lethal for butterflies.<\/p>\n\n \n Monarch caterpillars need to eat milkweed to survive, and adult monarch butterflies lay their eggs only on milkweed plants.<\/p>\n
Jim Hudgins \/ USFWS<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIn a similar study in 2022, Forister and his team tested 235 milkweed plants from 33 retail nurseries across the U.S. and detected 61 different pesticides, with an average of 12.2 pesticides per plant. This echoes the findings of a 2020 study in which Forister tested milkweed plants across 19 sites in California\u2019s Central Valley and two stores that sell plants to home gardeners\u2014pesticides were found in all 227 samples.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe couldn\u2019t find a milkweed leaf in the north Central Valley that didn\u2019t have pesticides in it or on it,\u201d says Forister. The 2020 study counted 64 different insecticides, herbicides and fungicides in total. \u201cOf this very long list, only a small number have ever been tested on a monarch caterpillar\u2014and that\u2019s just the monarch,\u201d Forister adds. \u201cWhen you think about the more than 150 other butterflies in the state, we know almost nothing.\u201d<\/p>\n
Black describes the butterfly\u2019s plight as a \u201cdeath by a thousand cuts\u201d scenario. While pesticides ravage the insect\u2019s populations, habitat destruction and exacerbated droughts due to climate change only make things worse. According to Forister, however, even small changes can turn things around. And although progress against habitat loss and climate change will take time, pesticide use could, theoretically, be curbed much sooner.<\/p>\n
\u201cInsects are just amazing at responding very quickly to anything good that people do,\u201d he says. \u201cIf people stop putting insecticides in their yards, they\u2019ll see more insects. \u2026 Even in the heart of the Central Valley, we continue to be surprised by the level of resilience.\u201d<\/p>\n
A roadmap to recovery<\/h2>\n\n \n Two monarch butterflies warm their wings in the early morning at Lighthouse Field State Beach. Only 12,260 monarchs were counted during the 2025-26 season at 249 overwintering sites like this one.<\/p>\n
Darren Orf<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nAbout a 60-minute drive from Pacific Grove is Lighthouse Field State Beach in Santa Cruz. Behind the eponymous lighthouse that juts out into Monterey Bay, a stand of stalwart Monterey cypress protects monarchs nesting at the park\u2019s north end. The gray skies are gone, burned away by the surprisingly brilliant November sun overhead, and with that warmth, the blazing orange wings of the monarchs come to life as hundreds flutter from one tree to another.<\/p>\n
Crowds gather to take in these bright jewels. Some people are in awe; others express dismay at how few monarchs have survived their arduous fall migrations from the northwestern U.S. <\/strong>While 2021 saw thousands of butterflies visit Lighthouse Field, <\/strong>and hundreds of thousands more at nearly 300 overwintering sites, the 2025-26 season tallied near-record lows, with only 12,260 butterflies total across 249 sites\u2014the third-lowest figure since counting began in 1997.<\/p>\n\u201cIt\u2019s not uncommon for insect populations to go up and down by orders of magnitude,\u201d says Cheryl Schultz, an ecologist at Washington State University Vancouver and the senior author of the Science<\/em> paper. \u201cWhat we want to do is increase the floor so they don\u2019t go extinct.\u201d<\/p>\nThe problems facing butterflies seem almost insurmountable, but Schultz knows that the insects\u2019 disappearance doesn\u2019t need to be a foregone conclusion. That\u2019s because she led the charge of saving one species from the brink of extinction.<\/p>\n\n \n The Fender\u2019s blue butterfly was brought back from the brink of extinction with the help of conservationists who restored habitats with its host plant, Kincaid\u2019s lupine.<\/p>\n
USFWS<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nIn Oregon\u2019s Willamette Valley lives the Fender\u2019s blue, a small butterfly that relies on a flowering plant called Kincaid\u2019s lupine for survival. First documented in the 1920s, the butterfly disappeared in the \u201930s and was presumed extinct due to destruction of its beloved lupine. Then, miraculously, scientists rediscovered the butterfly near Eugene, Oregon, in the late 1980s. Though it had managed to evade extinction, the species remained perilously endangered. So Schultz began extensive fieldwork to restore its habitat in the Willamette Valley\u2019s upland prairies.<\/p>\n
Her team learned what the butterflies needed from their habitat, then helped establish some 90 sites that host the Fender\u2019s blue\u2014they found the locations, planted lupine and protected them. The species became a rare success story among insects by getting downlisted from \u201cendangered\u201d to \u201cthreatened\u201d under the Endangered Species Act. \u201cI\u2019m a person who\u2019s always focused on the positive and what we can do,\u201d Schultz says. \u201cThat little butterfly took a few decades, and it took a lot of people and a lot of commitment, but it can happen. I have to hold on to that.\u201d<\/p>\n
The monarch and Fender\u2019s blue share many characteristics. They both require specific plants, for example, and like most butterfly populations, their numbers are bouncy. However, monarchs are migratory, while the Fender\u2019s blue sticks to Oregon year-round. Migrating creatures bring their own challenges for conservation, as scientists need to spread their attention across a broad landscape\u2014but in some ways, the monarch isn\u2019t even the most difficult migratory species to conserve. The west coast lady, for instance, is found in across the western states and faces upwards of 80 percent declines in many regions.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s a dispersive, large, super-beautiful butterfly, and no one expected it to be in decline 20 years ago. But it\u2019s just plummeting everywhere,\u201d Forister says. \u201cIt\u2019s not going to be an easy solution for conservation, because for this particular butterfly, it is not easy to put our finger on a place where we can set up a fence around habitat to restore.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to Forister, the west coast lady and the western monarch are examples of traditional conservation biology meeting the headwinds of climate change. Although the methods used to restore the Fender\u2019s blue could work for many butterflies, dispersive and migratory species face the brunt of our warming world, especially because of the immense drying out of the Western U.S., which affects their specific host plants and increases the chances of extreme weather events.<\/p>\n
To better understand the stresses on these migratory species, scientists at Lighthouse Field are testing a new ultralight radio tag. Weighing less than a tenth of a gram, these tags, when placed on butterflies, can passively ping Bluetooth- and location-enabled cellphones of anyone nearby. The data is stored in an app called Project Monarch, which allows scientists to accurately track where female monarchs lay their eggs after overwintering.<\/p>\n
The hope is that by tracking the butterflies, researchers will find where female monarchs are headed after they leave sites like Pacific Grove and Lighthouse Field. Then, conservationists could employ the tried-and-true methods that saved the Fender\u2019s blue\u2014prioritizing those sites and providing milkweed habitat for future caterpillars.<\/p>\n
To build climate resilience into those new habitats, Diana Magor, a longtime volunteer monarch counter, is conducting her own research into the butterfly benefits of heartleaf milkweed. Although not as abundant as the showy or common milkweed, this variety grows earlier in the year. This is a particularly useful attribute, because as climate change causes warmer weather to arrive earlier, butterflies might migrate before common or showy milkweed has sprouted.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen we restore these habitats and manage pesticides, we see change\u2014positive change,\u201d Black says. \u201cThe diversity and abundance of insects goes up, and that happens really quickly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Farms could curtail pesticides, smarter land use could protect wild spaces and cutting carbon emissions could help the world avoid the worst-case climate scenarios. But despite conservationists\u2019 best efforts, many butterfly species will still be lost. Looking ahead, Forister hopes, at the very least, that they won\u2019t be forgotten.<\/p>\n
\u201cI started a new scientific journal recording the loss of species,\u201d he says. \u201cIt makes me feel better, because we\u2019re at least preserving a memory of things as they\u2019re going away and highlighting rare species that we can still look for.\u201d<\/p>\n
Hope for a possible future<\/h2>\n\n \n Western monarch butterflies cling to a eucalyptus branch at Natural Bridges State Beach. Although eucalyptus isn\u2019t native to California, the trees provide a tall, wind-resistant refuge that supports monarchs during the winter.<\/p>\n
Darren Orf<\/span><\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe sun\u2019s light is already weakening as visitors to Natural Bridges State Beach in Santa Cruz, only a few miles north of Lighthouse Field, descend a long boardwalk terminating at a large, wooden platform. A small group glances skyward in awed silence as, high in the canopies, hundreds of monarchs fly from tree to tree, moving like gently falling leaves that defy the inexorable laws of gravity.<\/p>\n
Just a few decades ago, at least 120,000 monarchs overwintered here\u2014in 2025, Natural Bridges saw only 2,500 at its highest count. Yet, faced with these overwhelming odds, these delicate insects metamorphose each year from caterpillars into an indelible symbol of resilience. For people like Johnston, Black, Forister, Magor and Schultz\u2014and the hundreds of others who give their time and talent to protect these vulnerable creatures\u2014seeing the monarchs brings hope.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere are a lot of people waking up and trying to do this,\u201d Black says. \u201cWill it be enough at the end of the day? \u2026 I don\u2019t know yet.\u201d But \u201cI go out and I look at these places and meet the people doing this great work, and it keeps me motivated.\u201d<\/p>\n
\n
\n
Get the latest Science<\/strong> stories in your inbox.<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n<\/nav>\n<\/section><\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Pesticides, habitat loss and climate change have taken their toll on the beloved insects. But the experts working with them still find hope for their future...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":585,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com\/YsOCKtRgiCdzBxaCjx_hzuHbdvE=\/fit-in\/160x80\/filters:no_upscale()\/https:\/\/tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com\/accounts\/headshot\/unnamed-edit.png","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rj"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Darren](\"https:\/\/th-thumbnailer.cdn-si-edu.com\/YsOCKtRgiCdzBxaCjx_hzuHbdvE=\/fit-in\/160x80\/filters:no_upscale()\/https:\/\/tf-cmsv2-smithsonianmag-media.s3.amazonaws.com\/accounts\/headshot\/unnamed-edit.png\")
\n <\/div>\n