{"id":767,"date":"2026-05-03T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/?p=767"},"modified":"2026-05-03T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T13:00:00","slug":"california-will-soon-have-more-than-300-data-centers-where-will-they-get-their-water","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rjbarrett.redirectme.net\/?p=767","title":{"rendered":"California will soon have more than 300 data centers. Where will they get their water?"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n This story was originally published by Inside Climate News <\/i>and is reproduced here as part of the\u00a0<\/i>Climate Desk<\/i>\u00a0collaboration.<\/i>\n <\/div>\n

The new data center proposed for a quiet city about 115 miles east of San Diego came across people\u2019s radars in different ways.<\/p>\n

For patrons of the deli on West Aten Road, it was the white \u201cNot In My Backyard\u201d signs jutting out of lawns.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

For local irrigation district workers, it was something called an \u201celectric service application.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

For Margie Padilla, it was a rant on Facebook.<\/p>\n

The 43-year-old mom came across a post online while she had a few minutes to scan social media last spring after a day spent tending her garden and taking care of her two boys.<\/p>\n

\u201cSomebody was complaining about this center,\u201d Padilla said. \u201cI was like, \u2018Whoa, what\u2019s going on here?\u2019\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

What\u2019s going on is the second-largest new data center being considered statewide, which would be less than half a mile from Padilla\u2019s stucco home in the center of Imperial Valley. If finished by 2028, as the developer expects, the at least 950,000-square-foot, two-story data center\u00a0could be the largest operating\u00a0statewide, taking up 17 football fields\u2019 worth of land.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The roughly $10 billion, 330-megawatt data center would require 750,000 gallons of water a day to operate, said developer Sebastian Rucci, who insists electricity and water costs won\u2019t rise due to the data center.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\"An
The proposed 330-megawatt data center in Imperial, Calif., is slated to take up 17 football fields of land and needs 750,000 gallons of water a day.
\n Courtesy of Sebastian Rucci<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\u201cWe have studies on the air. We have studies on the water. The electricity could be handled,\u201d Rucci said. \u201cWe did our homework.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Imperial officials haven\u2019t quelled local concerns, only noting that the project is facing litigation and that the center\u2019s long-term impacts on utilities haven\u2019t been determined.\u00a0<\/p>\n

On top of the financial burden of maintaining her family\u2019s health, gas and grocery expenses strain Padilla\u2019s budget, and she\u2019s worried a new data center will only increase water and power costs. Padilla, who first heard of the data center a year ago, has only grown more concerned, and she\u2019s not alone.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Some residents would see it from their backyards.<\/p>\n

\u201cI can only imagine the rates going up once that data center is up and running,\u201d she said, shading her eyes from the beaming sun.<\/p>\n

This is one of two dozen data centers expected to open in California in the next few years.<\/p>\n

Growing concern and regulatory gaps<\/strong><\/h3>\n

A majority of respondents to a nationwide\u00a0poll by the US Water Alliance\u2019s Value of Water campaign share Padilla\u2019s worries, with 54 percent extremely or very concerned about the e\ufb00ect data centers will have on water quality, water supply, and costs in their area.\u00a0<\/p>\n

In its first question about data centers since the poll began in 2016, two-thirds of voters said it was important for their state to have a plan for the e\ufb00ects of data centers on water in the coming years.<\/p>\n

\u201cI suspect that as data centers continue to be part of the broad conversation, then these numbers will probably continue to go up as people are more concerned about the impacts they have on the things that affect them and their communities, like supply, quality and cost,\u201d said Scott Berry, the senior advisor on policy and external affairs at the US Water Alliance, from Water Week in Washington D.C. this month.<\/p>\n

More than 90 percent of data centers in the U.S. get most of the water they need for cooling from municipal systems, estimated Shaolei Ren, an\u00a0associate professor\u00a0of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

During the hottest summer days, a large 100-megawatt facility can use about 1 million gallons of water for evaporative cooling. That amount is the same as about 10,000 people\u2019s daily water use at home, Ren said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But those centers require \u201czero water for many days of the year when it\u2019s cool outside,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Some data centers are exploring alternatives\u00a0like treated wastewater or graywater\u00a0for cooling instead of drinkable water, providing residents and officials with options that could reduce strain on local water supplies.<\/p>\n

California doesn\u2019t require AI data centers to report water usage, and the state\u2019s Water Resources Control Board does not maintain a specific list of water rights held by data centers. Although residents are working to require more transparency about water use from data centers, recent efforts to require the facilities\u2019 owners\u00a0to report how much\u00a0water they use to the state have faltered.<\/p>\n

On top of the data center boom in California, the hundreds of water districts, a deepening Southwestern megadrought and the diminishing\u00a0of the Colorado River\u00a0increasingly complicate water issues.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Also, while data centers can take as little as two to three years to build, developing new water sources can take as long as 20 years, said Ren.<\/p>\n

Plans for the steep increase in water demand from California data centers inevitably focus on infrastructure, experts said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWater is not purely an environmental issue,\u201d Ren noted. \u201cIn many places, it is fundamentally an infrastructure challenge.\u201d<\/p>\n

Across the country, water infrastructure upgrades are estimated to cost\u00a0between $10 billion to $58 billion, Ren\u2019s research team found.\u00a0How many more facilities are built and where will be a big factor in future infrastructure costs.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
The site of the proposed data center in Imperial, California.
\n Steven Rodas \/ Inside Climate News<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

The amount of electricity a data center uses, to some degree, determines how much heat it produces, and consequently how much cooling it requires and, in turn, how much water it needs.<\/p>\n

The Imperial County data center is one of 24 planned for completion across California by 2030, according to the latest information gathered by analysts at Cleanview, a market intelligence platform.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Based on the about 1.7 GW of electricity the proposed data centers would use, with at least two projects for which there aren\u2019t energy consumption figures, water infrastructure upgrade costs just for the demands of the centers in the state could run from about $200 million to $800 million, Ren said.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis number assumes that California data centers\u2019 water use intensity is the same as the national average,\u201d he explained.<\/p>\n

There is no central permitting authority for data centers in California, and most are overseen by city and county governments, according to the California Public Utilities Commission.\u00a0Data Center Map\u00a0shows 286 of the facilities currently operating in California.<\/p>\n

While California\u2019s size and tech focus lead some to expect many more data centers here, the cost and availability of power and land, as well as the general tax and regulatory climate, have been hurdles to building them out, according to the Data Center Coalition, which represents big corporations like Amazon, Meta, Google, and Microsoft.<\/p>\n

\n
\n Read Next<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n \"Two
\n <\/figure>\n
\n
\n Texas is giving data centers more than $1 billion in tax breaks each year\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n

Nonetheless, California trails only Virginia and Texas in the number of\u00a0individual data center locations, but its centers have much lower total new electricity capacity, which may also indicate lower water demand.<\/p>\n

A research team at the University of California, Riverside, recently found that data centers could collectively require 697 to 1,451 million gallons per day (MGD) of new water capacity nationally through 2030. New York City\u2019s average daily supply is about 1,000 MGD.<\/p>\n

Currently, data centers are estimated to use about 39 billion gallons of water nationally each year, Khara Boender, the senior manager for state policy at the Data Center Coalition, said, citing market\u00a0research from Bluefield.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI know when we start to talk about billions of gallons of water in a year, that sounds absolutely crazy,\u201d Boender said. \u201cLooking at how that falls into context with some of these other large water users, I think that that kind of contextualization could be surprising to folks.\u201d<\/p>\n

Alfalfa irrigation in California\u2019s Imperial Valley alone uses more than 800 billion gallons a year,\u00a0an April essay in Outside highlighted.\u00a0The beverage industry uses 533 billion gallons of water a year, and the semiconductor industry uses 59 billion gallons, Boender noted.<\/p>\n

But spikes in water needs for data centers can lead to bottlenecks in small community water systems, Ren, at\u00a0the University of California, Riverside, noted.\u00a0\u201cOnly comparing the annual totals can obscure the real water challenge,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

There is no single fix for the pressure data centers are placing on water supplies across the state, which will be different depending on the location and water systems where each facility is built, said Shivaji Deshmukh, the general manager of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California \u2014 the largest supplier of treated water in the U.S. The district serves 19 million people in six California counties.<\/p>\n

\u201cEvery community \u2014 even within our service area \u2014 is different in terms of costs, what type of supply they have. Some regions have access to groundwater. Some have access to treated wastewater or recycled water somewhere along the coast,\u201d Deshmukh said.<\/p>\n

So industries, most of which require water for cooling, will look to satisfy that thirst from different sources, depending on their location.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cImperial Irrigation District is one where I know they\u2019re discussing \u2026 installation of data centers in their area,\u201d Deshmukh said.<\/p>\n

The Imperial dilemma<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The plot of dirt on West Aton Road betrays nothing of the colossal data center that could one day sit on the land. Owner Sebastian Rucci hopes to have the facility up and running by the summer of 2028, he said.<\/p>\n

Rucci, who is also a lawyer, has purchased 235 acres for his data center so far. He says the data center will allow Google to train its Gemini artificial intelligence, although Google denies any involvement \u201cin a data center project in Imperial County.\u201d<\/p>\n

Before he can begin building on the site, a judge will weigh in on the city of Imperial\u2019s\u00a0lawsuit against the project, which demands that it clear higher environmental hurdles, including the California Environmental Quality Act \u2014 which often draws ire from developers who claim it can needlessly stall proposals. The local water district also has to complete its review of the project.<\/p>\n

Rucci is determined, though, citing a series of studies conducted by survey and consulting groups, and by the district itself, which manages water and provides power. He posted those\u00a0reports online to show\u00a0the data center made sense \u2014 in part because water and power could be effectively provided to the data center, and the land was permitted for industrial use.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"
Margie Padilla tours her garden on April 16, where she holds a carrot that she thinks hasn\u2019t grown well due to drier temperatures in the Imperial Valley.
\n Steven Rodas \/ Inside Climate News<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

The debate between supporters and opponents of the facility has escalated, with the next court date set for the end of April.<\/p>\n

With that date in mind, Padilla, the Imperial mother, set out to work in her garden on a balmy Thursday morning.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Donning a green, short-sleeved shirt and flip-flops, she checked on her squash, poked at her cherry tomatoes, and dug in her spade to move periwinkle to a better spot for watering. And through it all, she wondered what the thirst of the proposed data center would do to her garden. And her monthly water bill.<\/p>\n

Her payment for water, sewer, and trash services currently ranges from $90 to $130 a month \u2014 more than double what she paid six years ago.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m also afraid they\u2019re going to put [water] restrictions for us, for the residents,\u201d said Padilla, who estimates her family of four uses about 300 gallons of water a day. \u201cThat\u2019s going to be harsh on me, particularly, because of my garden. I grow my own food, my own vegetables.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Worries over power and water price surges are misguided, Rucci said. He has been considering power and water needs for the 18 months he has worked on the project, he said, and outlined how it would bring various economic benefits to the region, including about 100 permanent jobs post-construction.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\n Read Next<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\n \"\"
\n <\/figure>\n
\n
\n Data centers are straining the grid. Can they be forced to pay for it?\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n

Still, Padilla is thinking about other things. She says her two sons were anemic when they were younger, requiring them to eat fresh produce to supplement the iron their bodies needed. Even after treating the condition, the Imperial mom keeps her sons\u2019 diet filled with veggies and fruits. She needs her garden for that.<\/p>\n

The Imperial Irrigation District declined to be interviewed for this story but, in a written statement, noted that it has yet to receive a formal request for water for the project.<\/p>\n

The District, which provides water and power to all of Imperial County as well as parts of Riverside and San Diego counties, did not have specific estimates of how demand from the data center could impact its costs.<\/p>\n

\u201cWater was very concerning to us from the beginning,\u201d Rucci said.<\/p>\n

He\u2019s spoken with city officials in Imperial and El Centro to arrange a water deal for the facility, he said, and proposed getting 6 million gallons per day of reclaimed water from both cities.<\/p>\n

\u201cOur plan was we would do all the municipal upgrades at our cost, and then we would take the excess water and run it clean to the Salton Sea,\u201d he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Those conversations have not paid off, although Rucci said he remains hopeful municipal officials will help him get water for his facility.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWe first tried to do reclaimed water. I still prefer that, but that seems to be taking months, and I don\u2019t know if that \u2026 will happen,\u201d Rucci said. \u201cProbably we\u2019ll just get it from the [Imperial Irrigation District]\u201d by purchasing it for industrial use.<\/p>\n

How the center obtains its water may change as its plans are updated, he added.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Through it all, he remains confident the data center will be built in Imperial County and be good for the area.<\/p>\n

Carolina Paez disagrees.<\/p>\n

The 46-year-old mother\u2019s backyard abuts the data center site. She says she\u2019d be able to hit it with a rock from her property.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Both she and her son have asthma, and she\u2019s worried about the construction dust, potential pollution, and noise from the data center. And higher bills.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m not just thinking about the expenses that are going to increase, but also about the things that are going to lose value \u2014 for instance, my house,\u201d Paez said in Spanish.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat am I going to do with this property? Who would even want to live here?\u201d<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n